🔗 Share this article

The recent US national security strategy offers a flawed assessment of the European Union. The document asserts that open-border policies and so-called "progressive" policies pose an grave risk to the continent's identity. However, this argument is based on a fundamental misinterpretation of the situation. The true challenge facing the EU is not societal but economic and technological lag.

A Glaring Growth Gap Between Europe and the US

Statistics reveal a sobering picture. Between 2008 and 2023, American economic output grew by 87%, while a paltry thirteen and a half percent growth for the European Union. Over this time, European income per person fell from over three-quarters to just half of the American figure. Strikingly, even Mississippi now boasts a greater average income than several leading EU nations like Italy and France.

Today, roughly half of the global 50 largest technology firms are American, while a mere four are European.

The Innovation Shortfall: A Critical Question

The growing economic gap stems from superior efficiency gains in the US, fueled by breakthroughs and higher total factor productivity. The landscape of global tech dominance is overwhelmingly American. In the last fifty years, hundreds of American startups have grown into enterprises valued at over $10bn, compared with just 14 in Europe.

This gap raises a pressing issue: As the competition for future industries like AI, semiconductors, and quantum computing, what is Europe positioned? Most analysts concede it is largely a two-horse race involving the US and China, with European nations starting at a significant handicap.

Underlying Factors of the Continent's Innovation Gap

A number of key reasons account for this innovation chasm.

• Financing Ecosystem: The US boasts a far deeper and more dynamic system for financing new ventures. The EU has yet to establish a true unified investment market, which caps the scale of new firms.
• Regulatory Fragmentation: Excessive and fragmented rules hamper European business. A US startup can launch a product under a single set of laws to access a consumer base of hundreds of millions. The EU, despite a bigger population size, is divided among twenty-seven different national systems, creating huge internal barriers.
• Mindset Differences: Attitudes toward risk-taking vary greatly. In some EU nations, business failure was historically viewed with penalties, whereas in the US, it is often considered a badge of experience.
• Military Investment: The US benefits from a deeply integrated innovation pipeline linking defense and academia. Europe's long-term lack of spending in military capabilities has eroded its capacity for breakthrough innovation.

The Road Ahead: Reasons for Cautious Optimism

Despite these hurdles, one can find causes for optimism. Policymakers are growing more conscious of the existential challenge and have begun to advance substantial change. Notable analyses on EU competitiveness and the single market point to the necessity of major changes.

With the right policies and regulatory reforms, Europe's strengths might enable far greater levels of business-led breakthroughs.

Europe retains considerable strengths: skilled human capital, top-tier education systems, and premier labs. Alongside a large internal market and substantial household savings, these foundations could trigger a new wave of venture creation.

Crucially, even if the EU does not become the leader in developing cutting-edge tech, it can still dramatically increase economic output by adopting and adapting innovations from elsewhere.

A Critical Juncture

The European Union now stands at a critical moment. To paraphrase a famous line, decline often happens "gradually and then suddenly". To date, the continent's slide in innovation has been gradual. But, without bold steps to tackle its structural weaknesses, today's slow erosion could turn into a rapid and permanent decline in world influence.